Mr. Aditya K Singh is an Associate Partner of Link Legal India Law Services and has over 10 years of experience in advising and representing clients in precedent-setting commercial and regulatory matters before the Supreme Court, High Courts, Appellate Tribunals (In Competition, Corporate, Broadcasting and Power), Regulators (in Competition and Power).

He has also advised various private equity firms and financial institutions in their investment in Energy Sector, Port and SEZ etc.

He has strong interest in academics and regular contributed/quoted in Mercom, EQ International, Business Standard, etc and played instrumental role in finalization of courses on energy law of various law schools and technology schools.

  • 争议解决
  • 建设工程
  • 一般公司和商事业务
  • 工程索赔与纠纷管理
  • 重组与破产
  • 项目、基础设施和能源
B.A., LL.B. (Hons.), HNLU, RAIPUR; LL.M., INSTITUTE FOR LAW AND FINANCE, GOETHE UNIVERSITY, GERMANY
Jan 01 1970
by Live Law - dated 01st January 1970

Read the article 'Not All Disputes Are Amenable To The Jurisdiction Of Electricity Commission: PPAs Cannot Be Terminated During Moratorium' authored by Aditya K Singh, Associate Partner and Anukriti Jain, Senior Associate published on Live Law.

"This Judgment will give a positive message to the power sector. Because similar clauses of the Events of Default are present in all PPAs and this was always a concern of the developers/lenders/investors that if company goes under insolvency proceedings, this clause will make life tougher for the generator."

Read the full article here.

Jan 01 1970
by Mercom India - dated 01st January 1970

Read the article "Lack of Restitution Clause in Solar PPAs Must Not Lead to Rejection of Carrying Costs Claims" authored by our Regulatory Associate Partner, Aditya K Singh published on Mercom India.

"Electricity Commissions should not blindly rely on the Supreme Court judgment but exercise their regulatory power, read with other dictums of the Supreme Court. However, this does not mean that the Electricity Commissions should allow carrying costs in all cases, but they should exercise their power to allow it on a case-to-case basis. They should also take into consideration the conduct of the parties so that procurers/DISCOMS should not be burdened for the negligence of the generators."

Read the full article here.

Jan 01 1970
by Mercom India - dated 01st January 1970

Read the expert views of our Associate Partner, Aditya K Singh published by Mercom India in its story "APTEL Provides Interim Relief to Developers in the Scrapped GUVNL 700 MW Solar Auction".

"APTEL has taken the right step by giving interim relief to developers. Ideal relief should have been a complete stay on the tender. However, APTEL must have found it difficult because of the findings of APTEL in the order pronounced in Appeal Number 22 of 2016 (SunEdison Solar vs. DERC & Others). In the SunEdison case, Delhi DISCOM BSES had withdrawn its tariff adoption petition filed on the grounds of a significant reduction in solar power cost (a letter of intent was also issued to SunEdison). APTEL allowed the cancelation of the bidding process heavily relying on the term “consumer’s interest”"...

新德里

Thapar House, Central Wing, First Floor, 124 Janpath,
新德里 110 002.
(P) +91 11 4651 1000
(F) +91 11 4651 1099

寻找律师